DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BC
Docket No: 00704-14
5 June 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 5 June 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this -
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,
regulations, and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You reenlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period of active
duty on 1 March 1987 after serving over six years of honorable
service, On 8 November 1987, you received counseling concerning
your lack of attention to duty, job performance and not being at
the appointed place of duty on time. On 4 January 1988, you
refused orders due to your family hardship, however; there is no
documentation in your record reflecting that you submitted a
hardship request. On 14 February 1989, you received counseling
and were informed you that you would receive an RE-30 (failure
to obligate for orders) reentry code upon your separation. You
were released from active duty on 28 February 1989, with an
honorable characterization of service and assigned a waivable
RE-30 reentry code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors present in
your case. However, the Board found those factors insufficient
to warrant any change in your waivable reentry code in light of
your failure to obligate for orders. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
'_ the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidencé or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
etic A per
ROBERT D. ALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0458 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You submitted a request for a hardship discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0642 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 May 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0792 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. You were released from active duty on 1 May 2011, with an honorable characterization of service and assigned an RE-30 reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3832-13
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire ~ record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material | @rror or injustice, You enlisted in the Marine Corps and entered active duty on 17 August 1987. You were then recommended for administrative separation with a _ type warranted by your service record characterization of service due to your personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8736 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0295 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, -regulations, and policies. «Consequently, when applying for a. correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the | .existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0274 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00133-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5841 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are advised that a reentry code may not be routinely changed due merely to the passage of time or post service good conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0193 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material subniitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board found that RE- 3R is the most favorable reentry ‘code authorized when a Sailor is discharged at the expiration of his term of active...